Future comforts: re-conditioning urban environments

Researchers
Dr Elizabeth Shove
Heather Chappells

Institution
Lancaster University


Summary

Vast quantities of energy are required to heat or cool buildings to provide what are now regarded as acceptable standards of thermal comfort. Paradoxically, likely responses to global warming, such as greater reliance on air-conditioning, threaten to increase energy demand and emissions of CO2 and exacerbate rather than mitigate climate change. This project examines the link between global warming and the technologies and conventions of indoor environmental management. Starting from the proposition that concepts of comfort are socially and technically constructed, it examines the ambitions and approaches of practitioners and policy makers currently involved in specifying the indoor climates of the future. What assumptions of human 'need' are constructed and embedded in the built environment and with what consequences for conventions of 'normality' and associated patterns of resource intensity? The research, which involves a review of relevant literature, interviews and interaction with key actors (in the UK), is designed to engender and inform academic and non-academic debate about the future of the indoor climate and the ways of life associated with it. The goal is to consider how comfort might be defined and achieved under changing climatic conditions but in ways that do not exacerbate recognised environmental problems.

Background/rationale
Current technical specifications and norms suppose people to be comfortable at around 22oC. For many building scientists, architects and engineers the environmental challenge is therefore one of producing energy efficient buildings robust enough to cope with climate change, yet able to deliver uniform conditions indoors whatever the weather outside. However, historical and anthropological evidence shows that people of different cultures have reported being comfortable in temperatures ranging from 6 to 31oC. This suggests that comfort is not a universal physiological determined condition and that the relation between indoor and outdoor climate change, and the potential for adaptation or mitigation, is at heart a matter of social convention. Acknowledging that there are alternative ways of understanding and defining comfort, and hence of interpreting the environmental challenge ahead, this project collates and maps different disciplinary perspectives on comfort and the future construction of the indoor environment. It does so in order to reveal the social conventions embedded in otherwise technical interpretations of human need, and in order to better understand the long-term dynamics of indoor climate change.

Key research questions
Questions about human behaviour and environmental adaptation and mitigation generally focus on what prompts individuals to adopt more or less resource intensive means of meeting what seem to be non-negotiable needs, including those for thermal comfort. Taking a different approach, this project recognises that contemporary understandings of comfort are sociotechnically constructed, taken-for-granted and widely shared. Levels of energy consumption consequently depend upon the transformation of collective conventions about the characteristics and qualities of a normal indoor environment. The project therefore addresses the following questions: how are thermal 'needs' and norms defined, how do they change, and how might more sustainable expectations of comfort take root?

Research approach
Questions of thermal comfort have been addressed by building scientists, urban planners, social scientists, historians and anthropologists but there has been no concerted effort to bring these lines of enquiry together or to analyse the different perspectives on offer. The three stages of the project contribute to the development of a more interdisciplinary approach. The first step is to collate and analyse literature on the history, specification and provision of thermal comfort, to review different perspectives and lines of enquiry and take stock of the social and technical issues at stake. The second step is to record the views of property developers, manufacturers, research scientists, utility managers and regulators currently involved in shaping the future of comfort in the UK. Interviews with practitioners will help locate, compare, and better understand the ambitions and expectations of those in a position to influence the co-evolution of comfort-related technology and practice. The third step is to organise a workshop in which relevant interest groups, identified during the previous stages of the project, come together to consider the definition and provision of comfortable conditions within the built environment.

Intended outcomes
In focusing on the social and technical construction and transformation of thermal comfort this project promises to make an important contribution to debates about human activity, urban systems and environmental change. Specifically the project will:

  • Engender and inform research and debate about climate change, comfort, and the future of the indoor environment.
  • Review the ambitions and perspectives of those in a position to influence the social and technical specification and provision of comfort and pattern of energy demand.
  • Build an interdisciplinary research agenda spanning building and social science and involving historians, anthropologists, architects, planners and engineers.
  • Develop theories of social, technical and environmental change that go beyond individual models of human behaviour, decision-making and choice.
back to top

Project Update - October 2003

The "Future Comforts" project started at the beginning of April 2003 and will run to the end of March 2004. The aim of the project is to explore social conventions of thermal comfort and implications for the sustainability of the indoor environment in the context of global climate change.

The project comprises three sets of activities:

  1. Collating and analysing existing literature on the history, specification and provision of thermal comfort in order to review different interdisciplinary perspectives and lines of enquiry and take stock of the social and technical issues at stake.
  2. Recording the views of practitioners involved in the specification and construction of buildings in order to locate, compare, and better understand the ambitions and expectations of those in a position to influence the co-evolution of comfort-related technology and practice.
  3. Organising a workshop in which relevant interest groups, identified during the previous stages of the project, will come together to consider the definition and provision of comfortable conditions within the built environment.

In line with the first objective, we have reviewed cross-disciplinary work on comfort and produced a substantive annotated bibliography (comprising over 150 references) designed to stimulate debate and provide a useful resource for other researchers in the field. This bibliography and a literature review paper "Comfort: a review of paradigms, philosophies and practices" will be available on a project web-site by the end of October. Papers reporting the findings of this literature review exercise have been presented at three events: the British Sociological Association (BSA) annual conference in York (April 2003); the Environment and Human Behaviour programme "What is the Environment" seminar organised as part of the ESRC’s Social Science Week (June 2003); and, the annual meeting of the UK’s Thermal Comfort Interest Group at UMIST (September 2003). Another paper looking at changing conceptualisations of comfort and the challenge for sustainable consumption will shortly be published as part of an edited collection.

In terms of our second objective, we are currently interviewing key practitioners from the building industry. So far we have talked to air-conditioning manufacturers, building services engineers, BSRIA, BRE and the Energy Savings Trust. Further interviews are planned for October with representatives from RIBA, ODPM - Building Regulations Division, CIRIA and the Electricity Association. We have also attended a number of meetings organised by the UK’s Thermal Comfort Interest Group which has enabled us to identify the relevant actors involved in the specification of thermal standards for buildings in the UK and to take stock of their roles and objectives with regard to current and future developments. In addition, we have been involved in the development of an EPSRC proposal for a Thermal Comfort Consortium Group.

We expect that parts 1 and 2 of the project will be completed by the end of October. The remaining task is to organise a workshop designed to bring together academics and building practitioners to debate the future of comfort in the indoor environment. The workshop will take place in February at the Policy Studies Institute in London. In preparation for this event a discussion paper, reporting the findings of the interviews conducted in part 2 will be prepared and circulated to participants during November/December. It is anticipated that papers presented at the workshop will be published as a special edition of the journal Energy and Buildings. The final two months of the project will be set aside for this purpose and for the production of the ESRC final report.

back to top

Researchers

Dr Elizabeth Shove
Elizabeth Shove is a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Sociology at Lancaster University. She has been responsible for a number of research projects relating to energy use, consumption and practice and is author of A Sociology of Energy, Buildings and the Environment (with Simon Guy), and of Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience: the Social Organization of Normality. She co-ordinated a five-year programme of workshops and summer schools on 'Consumption, Everyday Life and Sustainability' and is now involved in a number of projects that have to do with the relation between ordinary technologies, routines, habits and practices.

Heather Chappells
Heather Chappells is currently completing her PhD in the Department of Sociology at Lancaster University. She has worked as a research associate on projects including: "Smart Metering and Sustainable Cities" (Newcastle University, EPSRC, 1996-1998) and "Domestic Consumption and Utility Services" (Lancaster University, EU, 1997-2000). Heather was co-ordinator of a workshop on "Infrastructures, Consumption and the Environment" (www.sls.wau.nl/es/infra), funded by the European Science Foundation (ESF), and in 1999/2001 co-organised ESF summer schools on "Consumption, Everyday Life and Sustainability" (www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/esf). Her current research interests focus on the restructuring of infrastructure networks and the social and technical construction of demand.

back to top

Contact Details

Dr Elizabeth Shove
Department of Sociology
Cartmel College
Lancaster University
Lancaster LA1 4YL

T.01524 594178
E.e.shove@lancaster.ac.uk

 



Heather Chappells
Department of Sociology
Cartmel College
Lancaster University
Lancaster LA1 4YL

T.01524 594178
E.h.chappells@lancaster.ac.uk
W.www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology

 

back to top


Publications

Project Update (pdf)
October 2003

The Environment and the Home (pdf)
October 2003

Changing human behaviour and lifestyle: a challenge for sustainable consumption? (pdf)
August 2003

back to top