Cultural Trends 27 reveals the huge spending gap that has opened up between privileged
Londoners and the impoverished regions. Among its key findings:
- In 1995/96, arts funding bodies spent a generous £39.39 per head of population on the arts
in the London Arts Board Region, compared with a miserable £7.74 per capita in the South East region,
£9.24 in the South West region, £9.37 in the Eastern Region, and £9.95 in the Yorkshire
and Humberside region (full table included
as appendix).
- The Arts Council spent £11.86 per capita on arts and culture in London, compared
with only £2.26 in the East Midlands, £2.53 in the North West and £2.75 in Yorkshire and
Humberside. Nearly half (45%) of Arts Council funds are spent in London.
- A total of £18.28 per capita from the National Lottery went to support arts and
culture in London, compared with just £1.87 in the East Midlands, £1.80 in Yorkshire and
Humberside and £2.29 in East Anglia.
- Business sponsorship of the arts amounted to £5.77 per capita in London, compared
with just 26p in East Anglia, 31p in the East Midlands and 49p in the West Midlands.
- Museums in London and the South East received £4.16 per capita from the National
Lottery, compared with only 7p in the North East, 11p in the West Midlands and 56p in the
South West.
- With the exception of the Birmingham Royal Ballet and the Royal Shakespeare Company,
all the national clients funded by the Arts Council are based in London. As a result, 85 per cent
of the £65m funds for such organisations is spent in the capital. Indeed, 61 per cent goes to
support just three organisations: the Royal Opera House, South Bank Centre and the English
National Opera.
|