Factors Affecting Public Engagement by Researchers
Funded by: A consortium of 14 UK public funders of research, led by Wellcome Trust
February 2015 to July 2015
Background, summary and aims
The objective of the research was to provide independent insight and evidence to support future UK planning and strategy for supporting researchers to engage with the public. Kevin Burchell wrote a literature review, supported the development of new quantitative and qualitative research and wrote the Executive Summary for the main report. The research was funded by a consortium of UK public funders of research, led by the Wellcome Trust.
The final reports from the research, as well as the literature review, were launched at the ENGAGE conference on Wednesday 2 December 2015.
Kevin’s headline conclusions from the research are:
The research “suggests that the embedding of public engagement in institutional cultures is best understood as a ‘work in progress’. There are positive indications in the project outputs that public engagement is increasingly part of the landscape of higher education and research institutions, and that participation in and value placed on public engagement has increased in recent years. At the same time, the research suggests that researchers and institutions remain uncertain about public engagement, within the context of a profession that is driven by research (and teaching). The project suggests that public engagement is more firmly embedded in the context of the arts, humanities and social sciences than it is among researchers in science, technology, engineering and mathematics. Institutional change of this kind is known to be highly challenging and higher education institutions are known to be relatively slow to change. Within this context, the project indicates that, while current strategies have been helpful, longer-term effort – perhaps targeted in particular domains – is required.”
The Consortium’s headline conclusions from the research are:
The research “shows that there has been a positive shift in researchers’ understanding and attitudes to public engagement over the last 10 years. This shift represents an important milestone on a longer journey of culture change for the research and higher education sectors, which remains a ‘work in progress’. The survey finds that researchers are now considerably more personally motivated in this area yet challenges remain. The findings also suggest that more needs to be done to support, reward and recognise researchers so as to embed public engagement as an integral part of a research career.”
Kevin’s literature review is here.
The main report is here.
All of the project reports and outputs are available here.
Burchell, K., Sheppard, C. and Chambers, J. (2017) A ‘work in progress’?: UK researchers and participation in public engagement, Research for All, 1(1): 198-224.
Dr Burchell’s previous work on public engagement
- Burchell, K., Franklin, S. and Holden K. (2009) Public culture as professional science: final report of ‘ScoPE – Scientists on public engagement: from communication to deliberation?’, BIOS, LSE, September.
- Burchell, K. and Holden K. (eds.) (2008) The roles of social science in public dialogue on science and technology: report of a one-day stakeholder workshop, BIOS, LSE, July.
- Burchell, K. (2007) Empiricist selves and contingent ‘others’: the performative function of the discourse of scientists working in conditions of controversy, Public Understanding of Science, 16(2), 145-162.